Basic principles in Buddhism - Karma in Buddhism and orthodox perspective - this nonsense of karma comes and comes again. Only the quality, i.e. social environment, physical appearance, and mental abilities of a person determine they are from the actions of previous beings, but now the actions of. If you see other people suffering and you are able to help, you are not focusing on their karmic past but on your karmic opportunity in the present: Someday you may find yourself in the same situation that they are in now, so is the euk your reason to act in the way that would you want them to act towards you when that day comes. This isn't about lamentation. In Buddhism, regeneration is part of the continuous process of change. In fact, we are not reborn only at the moment of death, we are born and reborn every moment. However, the Bible was not about karma but about God's judgment. The full biblical verse is: Do not be fooled, God is not mocked; for whoever he sows, he will also reap. - Galatians 6:7). The concept of karma is nothing but a cunning attempt to get the soul into the laws of physics and so the fans believe they depend on the guru for their release. Young Agers want to refer to karma as the law of personal responsibility when in reality it's the opposite, a mechanism that allows one to behave as pleases, having full awareness that in some future life date everything will be balanced and not fundamental because the young Agers believe the law of karma could not function in full effect over a single lifetime, suggest a long series of lives over which Soul's "souls" "work from its bad karma. The final result, allegedly, of this long evolutionary process is the realization of God, the great illumination in which the soul eventually becomes a god. Therefore, the metropolitan is being traded as a perfect mechanism of self-control, so the disparities and imperfections in a person are gradually diminished and eliminated. This amazing philosophy is designed to ensure that no one makes a serious effort towards their personal salvation since, as the New Agers claim, everyone is saved from the beginning, so does anyone need a Savior? Again, Lucifer achieves an important goal when he gets someone to accept her menacing philosophy. The New Age movement has tried several ways to trade reincarnation among Christians. Among them is a hypnotic recession, where the subject is placed in a situation that looks innocent and is caused to remember episodes of his "previous lives". This is an extremely clever trick since hypnosis, by its nature, exposes the subject to demonic influences. Therefore, the implantation of "memories" is easy. Young Agers also wish to mention cases of children remembering their past lives. This is extremely sad since children are very subjective and able to accept all sorts of myths and stories as part of their personal reality. If they are members of a family with concealed carry, the child may also be exposed to an uncertain spirit and implanted with "memories" based on a verifiable fact. It is worth noting that the great architect behind most of the New Era philosophies, Mrs. Blavatsky, did not support herself the principle of reincarnation in her first major project, Isis Unveiled. If the fact of reincarnation is such a central doctrine of New Age thought, then why was it not once mentioned in the monumental volume (over 1470 pages)? The reason is simple - it has not yet been defined (in 1877) as important the piece of toxic Friday that Lucifer is preparing about the carelessness. If you have any doubt about Blavatsky's obedience to Lucifer's sovereignty, that the name she gave to her theosophical magazine was Lucifer and that the publishing house founded by her students to spread her works was called beginning Lucifer Publishing Company (which was later named to Lucis Trust). Her books, Isis Unveiled, and the secret teaching are filled with Luciferian philosophy. Remove the ancient landmark, which your fathers have set. People foolishly think they can feed on certain New Era beliefs, coexisting with their Christian faith, but that's not possible. As the Bible says, "Is a fountain coming to send to the same place sweet and bitter water?" (James 3:11). If one move is Luciferian in each particular, it is Luciferian all the way
No comments:
Post a Comment